2010年1月4日星期一

Clothing retailer abercrombie and fitch


Dean, who was born without her left forearm and has worn a prosthetic limb since she was three months old, is suing for disability discrimination after she was left “personally diminished [and] humiliated” when she refused to remove her cardigan at work last summer.”I had been bullied out of my job,” she said. “It was the lowest point I had ever been in my life.”It is believed Dean is seeking around £25,000 in compensation for her experiences under what she described as A&F’s “oppressive regime”. Her legal team would not comment on the sum.

Clothing retailer abercrombie and fitch has been accused of “hiding” a sales assistant in a stockroom at a London outlet because her prosthetic arm didn’t fit with its “look policy”, a tribunal has heard.Riam Dean, a 22-year-old law student from Greenford, west London, claims she was removed from the shop floor at the company’s Savile Row branch when management became aware of her disability.
Dean claims that when she told Ruehl No.925 about her disability after getting the job, the firm agreed she could wear a white cardigan to cover the link between her prosthesis and her upper arm. But shortly afterwards, she was told she could not work on the shop floor unless she took off the cardigan as she was breaking the firm’s “look policy”. She told the tribunal that someone in the A&F head office suggested she stay in the stockroom “until the winter uniform arrives”.
The “look policy” stipulates that all employees “represent abercrombie and fitch with natural, classic American style consistent with the company’s brand” and “look great while exhibiting individuality”. Workers must wear a “clean, natural, classic hairstyle” and have nails which extend “no more than a quarter inch beyond the tip of the finger”.Dean said today in her evidence: “A female A&F manager used the ‘look policy’ and the wearing of the cardigan as an excuse to hide me away in the stockroom.
“I knew then that I was being treated different and unfairly because of my disability. Her words pierced right through the armour of 20 years of building up personal confidence about me as a person, and that I am much more than a girl with only one arm … ”
Dean said the “look policy” was inconsistent: “Having visible tattoos breaks the ‘look policy’ and yet I’ve seen a worker with a tribal arm tattoo which is very noticeable and yet Abercrombie allowed him to work on the shop floor. Clearly their reasoning goes far deeper and I’m sure it’s not the cardigan which breaks the look policy, it’s the disabled label which does,” she said.
She added: “I am born with a character trait I am unable to change, thus to be singled out for a minor aesthetic ‘flaw’ made me question my worth as a human being.”Abercrombie taught me that beauty lies in perfection, but I would tell them that beauty lies in diversity, for I would rather live with my imperfection than to exude such ugliness in their blatant display of eugenics in policies and practices.”
Her friend Genevieve Reed told the tribunal that Dean had changed since working at A&F, and had “started to question whether this was just the first of a series of obstacles she would come up against in her life due to her disability”.
Medical evidence presented to the tribunal revealed Dean had undergone a psychiatric assessment to support an application for disability support funding several months before starting work at A&F last May. The psychiatrist described her as “socially isolated”, with an anxiety disorder that reached “phobic levels” relating to a fear of travelling on public transport.

2010年1月3日星期日

ANF

ANF is also going to face quite a hurdle with the holiday shopping season approaching. Will parents be willing to drop $85 for a sweater, or nearly $100 for a pair of jeans for their kids? Some will , but I’m Ruehl No.925 guessing that many won’t. The same thing with the back-to-school shopping season — how many parents are willing to pay $35 for a t-shirt because it says Hollister? Again, some will, but I bet many won’t. Will the stock be able to withstand hollister clothing further same-store sales disappointments? We could soon find out.

ANF opened at $31.30 this morning, about 2% lower than Wednesday’s closing price. The biggest danger for the stock is a technical hurdle that it recently cleared but will now have to face again. Shares of theabercrombie and fitch retailer were relying on the support of their 10-month moving average, but this trendline should now be in a position to act as resistance. This fact doesn’t mean that the stock is doomed for failure, but resistance isn’t exactly what ANF can use right now. The stock had actually put together a nice little run starting early in the year, but that could now come to an end.



For people who are looking for affordable clothing that is still at the height of fashion, the Abercrombie and Fitch outlet store is their one stop resource. Brand names like this one have a well earned reputation. People wear them because the name itself tells others that they have good taste and only want the best. In this Declining economy however, wanting to buy the best and being able or afford the best may be two entirely different things.

The Abercrombie and Fitch outlet store solves the problem for those feeling the impact of the economy or for people who want to look their best but simply can’t afford to pay off the rack prices that they may find in high end retail stores. That’s what outlet stores are all about.

So, how can the abercrombie and fitch outlet store afford to sell clothing at the kind of prices you find at outlet stores? Simple. The clothes you find at the hollister stores are put their when their season is over. In other words, abercrombie tees has come out with their new line and they send the line from the past season to the outlet store.

For some reason a lot of people are under the impression that clothing sold at outlet stores has a lower quality than clothing sold in retail stores. This simply isn’t true. The clothes you find in outlet stores are the very same clothes you find in any retail store. They are simply a season behind. They are made by the same manufacturer and were likely sold in the very retail store that people think is better than the outlet store.